The Philosopher
Johann Georg Hamann
The face
The background
- Nationality:
- German
- Schools:
- Post-Kantian, Counter-Enlightenment, Sturm und Drang
- Branchs:
- Aesthetics, Epistemology, Philosophy of language, Philosophy of mind, Philosophy of history, Political philosophy
- Period:
- 18th-century philosophy
The synopsis
The works
Golgotha and Scheblimini! By a Preacher in the Wilderness
Socratic Memorabilia
Aesthetica in nuce
The quotes
The thirst for vengeance was the beautiful nature which Homer imitated.
A writer who is in a hurry to be understood today or tomorrow runs the danger of being misunderstood the day after tomorrow.
Every phenomenon of nature was a word, - the sign, symbol and pledge of a new, mysterious, inexpressible but all the more intimate union, participation and community of divine energies and ideas.
If only I was as eloquent as Demosthenes, I would have to do no more than repeat a single word three times.
Nature is a book, a letter, a fairy tale (in the philosophical sense) or whatever you want to call it.
Everything is vain and tortures the spirit instead of calming and satisfying it.
The farther reason looks the greater is the haze in which it loses itself.
Physics is nothing but the ABC's. Nature is an equation with an unknown, a Hebrew word which is written only with consonants to which reason has to add the dots.
Our reason arises, at the very least, from this twofold lesson of sensuous revelations and human testimonies.
Poetry is the mother-tongue of the human race.
Everything the human being heard from the beginning, saw with its eyes, looked upon and touched with its hands was a living word; for God was the word.
All human wisdom works and has worries and grief as reward.
Thus the public use of reason and freedom is nothing but a dessert, a sumptuous dessert.
The weakness of ourselves and of our reason makes us see flaws in beauties by making us consider everything piece by piece.
Indeed, if a chief question does remain: how is the power to think possible? - The power to think right and left, before and without, with and above experience? then it does not take a deduction to prove the genealogical priority of language.
What good to me is the festive garment of freedom when I am in a slave's smock at home?
Hence it happens that one takes words for concepts, and concepts for the things themselves.