The Philosopher
Jeffrey Sachs
The face
The background
- Nationality:
- American
- Schools:
- Keynesian economics
- Branchs:
- Political economics, International development, Sustainable development, Poverty Alleviation, Health and Aid Policy, Environmental Sustainability, Climate change, Disease Control, globalization
- Period:
- 21st-century
The synopsis
The works
The ages of globalization: geography, technology, and institutions
A new foreign policy: beyond American exceptionalism
Building the new American economy: smart, fair, and sustainable
The age of sustainable development
To move the world: JFK's quest for peace
The price of civilization: reawakening American virtue and prosperity
Common wealth: economics for a crowded planet
The End of Poverty: Economic Possibilities for Our Time
Development Economics
Poland's jump to the market economy
Economics of Worldwide Stagflation
The quotes
Globalization was a deep trend pushed by technology and right ideas, as much as anything else.
In my view, there is an urgent need to communicate with the public and help to explain where there is consensus, and where are there doubts about the issues of sustainable development.
Despite a decade of criticism and budget cuts, the specialised UN agencies have far more expertise and hands-on experience than any other organisations in the world.
If you have a lot of short-term debt, it means that all of that money can be demanded in a very short period of time. Technically, short-term debt means money that's coming due within a year. Typically, it means money that's coming due within 30 to 90 days.
Roosevelt talked not only about Freedom from Fear, but also Freedom from Want.
The runs started in Thailand after the IMF intervened in such a dramatic way. Then the IMF came to Indonesia.
I think the IMF helped to detonate the Indonesian crisis.
It's not so unusual to run out of someone else's currency.
Unfortunately, the real focus in this country has not been on the rest of the world. It's been on our own issues and our own problems. Fair enough. But it means that our simple hopes that everything will just work out abroad aren't really coming to pass.
Devaluations are never easy.
We've taken the view that if the rest of the world would democratize and create market economies, that would spread the benefits of prosperity around the world, and that it would enhance our own prosperity, and our own stability and security, as well.
If we did go into a recession, something that's always possible for the U.S. or Europe, we could lower interest rates and expand the money supply without worrying about the price of gold.
The essence of Africa's crisis is fundamentally its extreme poverty.
The Russian drama began at the end of 1991, when the Soviet Union mercifully ended. Russia and 14 other new countries emerged from the ruins of the Soviet Union. Every one of those 15 new states faced a profound historical, economic, financial, social and political challenge.
The idea that UN commitments should be followed by action is indeed a radical one, especially for the United States, where wilful neglect of its own commitments is the rule.
The basic idea was that if a country would put its economy as an integrated piece of the world system, that it would benefit from that with economic growth. I concur with that basic view.
In Asia, a lot of successful economies that had been living on their own saving, decided to open up their financial markets to international capital in the early 1990s. So here were countries doing quite well, but they decided they'd borrow a bit more and do even better.
The great leaders of the second world war alliance, Franklin Roosevelt and Winston Churchill, understood the twin sides of destruction and salvation. Their war aims were not only to defeat fascism, but to create a world of shared prosperity.
The longer you wait, the less fun. If you wait until the bitter end, the whole economy can be destroyed.
We, being the Western world, wouldn't let Russia off the hook on debt. So there were demands on debt servicing in the early days until they ran out of reserves. There was no real aid program, just a fictional aid program.
Russia has gone through eight years of continuing economic pain.
In the early 1990s, when a lot of the developing world opened up to international capital flows... they ended up in very good long-term projects, but projects that weren't going to pay off for five or 10 or 20 years.
There's a lot of strength in the U.S., but there's a lot of froth also. The froth will blow off. We're going to have to face up to some realities that we're not fully facing up to right now.
We had a booming stock market in 1929 and then went into the world's greatest depression. We have a booming stock market in 1999. Will the bubble somehow burst, and then we enter depression? Well, some things are not different.
The debts are unaffordable. If they won't cancel the debts I would suggest obstruction; you do it yourselves.
Let's start fresh with Russia on some real help and some real reform.
Senior development specialists in the Treasury can be counted on one hand. America's government is not even aware of the gap between its commitments and action, because almost nobody in authority understands the actions that would be needed to meet the commitments.
We're going to have to forgive a great deal of the Soviet era debt. There's no question about that. Let's face up to that. We're going to have to put in money if Russia is really going to consolidate a democracy.
We were proposing, in a sense, that the rest of the world be made safe for American ideas, as they adopted intellectual property rights that gave patent protection to our very innovative economy.