The Philosopher
James Lovelock
The face
The background
- Nationality:
- English
- Schools:
- Gaia hypothesis
- Branchs:
- Chemistry, Earth science, Environmental Science, Biophysics
- Period:
- 20th and 21st century
The synopsis
James Ephraim Lovelock (26 July 1919 – 26 July 2022) was an English independent scientist, environmentalist and futurist. He is best known for proposing the Gaia hypothesis, which postulates that the Earth functions as a self-regulating system. With a PhD in the chemistry of disinfection, Lovelock began his career performing cryopreservation experiments on rodents, including successfully thawing and reviving frozen specimens. His methods were influential in the theories of cryonics (the cryopreservation of humans). He invented the electron capture detector and, using it, became the first to detect the widespread presence of chlorofluorocarbons in the atmosphere. While designing scientific instruments for NASA, he developed the Gaia hypothesis. In the 2000s, he proposed a method of climate engineering to restore carbon dioxide–consuming algae. He was an outspoken member of Environmentalists for Nuclear Energy, asserting that fossil fuel interests have been behind opposition to nuclear energy, citing the effects of carbon dioxide as being harmful to the environment and warning of global warming due to the greenhouse effect. He wrote several environmental science books based upon the Gaia hypothesis from the late 1970s. He also worked for MI5, the British security service, for decades.
The works
Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth
The Ages of Gaia: A Biography of Our Living Earth
Homage to Gaia: The Life of an Independent Scientist
The Revenge of Gaia: Why the Earth Is Fighting Back – and How We Can Still Save Humanity
The Vanishing Face of Gaia: A Final Warning: Enjoy It While You Can
Novacene: The Coming Age of Hyperintelligence
The quotes
Sadly, it's much easier to create a desert than a forest.
One pound of uranium is worth about 3 million pounds worth of coal or oil.
I suspect any worries about genetic engineering may be unnecessary. Genetic mutations have always happened naturally, anyway.
The problem is we don't know what the climate is doing. We thought we knew 20 years ago. That led to some alarmist books - mine included - because it looked clear-cut, but it hasn't happened.
Civilization in its present form hasn't got long.
I would only have been too pleased if someone had asked me for my data. If you really believed in your data, you wouldn't mind someone looking at it. You should be able to respond that if you don't believe me go out and do the measurements yourself.
You never know with politicians what they are really saying. And I don't say that in a negative way-they have an appalling job.
You mustn't take what I say as gospel because no one can second-guess the future.
What I like about sceptics is that in good science you need critics that make you think: 'Crumbs, have I made a mistake here?' If you don't have that continuously, you really are up the creek. The good sceptics have done a good service, but some of the mad ones I think have not done anyone any favours.
Fudging the data in any way whatsoever is quite literally a sin against the holy ghost of science. I'm not religious, but I put it that way because I feel so strongly. It's the one thing you do not ever do. You've got to have standards.
We'd never have got a chance to go outside and look at the earth if it hadn't been for space exploration and NASA.
Just after World War II, this country led the world in science by every way you could measure it, yet the number of scientists was a tiny proportion of what it is now.
Nature favors those organisms which leave the environment in better shape for their progeny to survive.
One thing that being a scientist has taught me is that you can never be certain about anything. You never know the truth. You can only approach it and hope to get a bit nearer to it each time. You iterate towards the truth. You don't know it.
All the modelling we do shows that the climate is poised on the jump up to a new hot state. It is accelerating so fast that you could say that we are already in it.
Climatologists are all agreed that we'd be lucky to see the end of this century without the world being a totally different place, and being 8 or 9 degrees hotter on average.
NASA will send up a big sun shade that will be in orbit between the earth and sun and deflect 2 or 3 percent of the sunshine back into space. It would be cheaper than the international space station.
A billion could live off the earth; 6 billion living as we do is far too many, and you run out of planet in no time.
I've got personal views on the '60s. You can't have freedom without paying the price for it.
It just so happens that the green religion is now taking over from the Christian religion. I don't think people have noticed that, but it's got all the sort of terms that religions use... The greens use guilt. That just shows how religious greens are. You can't win people round by saying they are guilty for putting (carbon dioxide) in the air.
I'm not a pessimist, even though I do think awful things are going to happen.
The oil companies regard nuclear power as their rival, who will reduce their profits, so they put out a lot of disinformation about nuclear power.
Life clearly does more than adapt to the Earth. It changes the Earth to its own purposes. Evolution is a tightly coupled dance, with life and the material environment as partners. From the dance emerges the entity Gaia.
Gas is almost a give-away in the U.S. at the moment. They've gone for fracking in a big way. This is what makes me very cross with the greens for trying to knock it... Let's be pragmatic and sensible and get Britain to switch everything to methane. We should be going mad on it.
So-called 'sustainable development'... is meaningless drivel.
If we gave up eating beef we would have roughly 20 to 30 times more land for food than we have now.
There aren't just bad people that commit genocide; we are all capable of it. It's our evolutionary history.
The tropical rain forests are a telling example. Once cut down, they rarely recover. Rainfall drops, deserts spread, the climate warms.
If you start any large theory, such as quantum mechanics, plate tectonics, evolution, it takes about 40 years for mainstream science to come around. Gaia has been going for only 30 years or so.
We rushed into renewable energy without any thought. The schemes are largely hopelessly inefficient and unpleasant. I personally can't stand windmills at any price.
If a power station were to be built down the road, I'd prefer a nuclear plant over an oil burner, and definitely over a coal burner. We simply have to lessen our consumption of fossil fuels.
Science always uses metaphor.
Nowadays if you're dependent on a grant - and 99% of them are - you can't make mistakes as you won't get another one if you do.
Let's make hay while it lasts.
Evolution is a tightly coupled dance, with life and the material environment as partners. From the dance emerges the entity Gaia.
If it hadn't been for the Cold War, neither Russia nor America would have been sending people into space.
There is little evidence that our individual intelligence has improved through recorded history.
The climate is doing its usual tricks. There's nothing much really happening yet. We were supposed to be halfway toward a frying world now.
I have heard that the Saudi Arabians are paying Greenpeace to campaign against Nuclear Power. It wouldn't surprise me at all.
For each of our actions there are only consequences.
An inefficient virus kills its host. A clever virus stays with it.
This programme to stop nuclear by 2020 is just crazy. If there were a nuclear war, and humanity were wiped out, the Earth would breathe a sigh of relief.
The world has not warmed up very much since the millennium.
China will soon emit more greenhouse gases than America, but its regime knows if it caps aspirations there will be a revolution.
Life does more than adapt to the Earth. It changes the Earth to its own purposes.
Geological change usually takes thousands of years to happen but we are seeing the climate changing not just in our lifetimes but also year by year.
Florida will be gone altogether, the whole damned place, in not too long.
Esso has been the main one in America spreading the disinformation that there is no global warming problem.
I don't think we're yet evolved to the point where we're clever enough to handle a complex a situation as climate change. The inertia of humans is so huge that you can't really do anything meaningful.