The Philosopher
Douglas N. Walton
The face
The background
- Nationality:
- Canadian
- Branchs:
- Communication studies, Philosophy
- Period:
- 20th-21st century
The synopsis
Douglas Neil Walton (born 2 June 1942, died 3 January 2020) was a prominent Canadian academic and author, celebrated for his significant contributions to the fields of argumentation, logical fallacies, and informal logic. His academic career saw him associated with institutions such as the University of Windsor, where he held the Assumption Chair of Argumentation Studies and later served as a Distinguished Research Fellow at the Centre for Research in Reasoning, Argumentation, and Rhetoric. Walton's work is characterized by a practical methodology aimed at identifying, analyzing, and evaluating arguments across various domains, including law, science, and everyday discourse. This approach, which he termed "logical argumentation," emphasizes a dialogue structure, commitment-based analysis, and the study of defeasible arguments and argumentation schemes. His research has found practical applications in legal argument preparation and the development of artificial intelligence. Walton's prolific output includes numerous books and papers, solidifying his legacy as a key figure in contemporary argumentation theory.
The works
The Douglas Walton Reader
Statutory Interpretation - Pragmatics and Argumentation
Handbook of legal reasoning and argumentation
Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation: The Pragmatics of Quotation and Reporting
Argument Evaluation and Evidence
Goal-based Reasoning for Argumentation
Burden of Proof, Presumption and Argumentation
Emotive Language in Argumentation
Methods of Argumentation
Argumentation Schemes
Informal Logic: A Pragmatic Approach, second edition
Witness Testimony Evidence: Argumentation, Artificial Intelligence and Law
Dialog Theory for Critical Argumentation
Media Argumentation: Dialectic, Persuasion and Rhetoric
Character Evidence: An Abductive Theory
Fallacies: Selected Papers: 1972–1982
Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation
Argumentation Methods for Artificial Intelligence in Law
Abductive Reasoning
Relevance in Argumentation
Ethical Argumentation
Legal Argumentation and Evidence
Scare Tactics: Arguments that Appeal to Fear and Threats
Appeal to Popular Opinion
One-Sided Arguments: A Dialectical Analysis of Bias
Ad Hominem Arguments
The New Dialectic
Appeal to Expert Opinion: Arguments from Authority
Appeal to Pity: Argumentum ad Misericordiam (SUNY Series in Logic and Language)
Historical Foundations of Informal Logic
Argument Structure: A Pragmatic Theory
Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning
Arguments from Ignorance
Fallacies Arising from Ambiguity
Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning
A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy
The Place of Emotion in Argument
Plausible Argument in Everyday Conversation
Slippery Slope Arguments
Begging the Question: Circular Reasoning as a Tactic of Argumentation
Practical Reasoning: Goal-Driven, Knowledge-Based, Action-Guiding Argumentation
Informal Logic: A Handbook for Critical Argumentation
Question-Reply Argumentation
Informal Fallacies (Pragmatics and Beyond Companion Series, IV)
Courage: A Philosophical Investigation
Arguer's Position: A Pragmatic Study of Ad Hominem Attack, Criticism, Refutation, and Fallacy
Physician-Patient Decision-Making
Logical Dialogue-Games and Fallacies
Ethics of Withdrawal of Life Support Systems
Topical Relevance in Argumentation